We wish you a very happy, healthy and joyous holiday season.
cc licensed flickr photo shared by P_R_
Thursday, December 24, 2009
Happy Holidays from Fastcase
Wednesday, December 23, 2009
Lawsuit of the Day: Michael Jordan Has Beef with Chicagoland Grocery Chain
We hope that by this point in the week you have pried yourselves away from your computers, Blackberrys, or iPhones, and you are wrapped tightly in your Snuggies or Slankets in front of the fireplace with your nearest and dearest. But for those of you who are still plugged in, we have a juicy little tid-bit of a lawsuit for your entertainment.
NBA legend Michael Jordan filed a pair of $5 million lawsuits against two Chicago-area grocery stores -- Dominick's Finer Foods and Jewel Food Stores -- for using his identity without permission in ads that were published in a commemorative Sports Illustrated issue lauding Jordan's achievements. Each of the ads -- which featured Jordan's name and jersey number (23!) -- also promoted Dominick's and Jewel. The Dominick's ad and resulting lawsuit are particularly meaty -- this particular ad included a $2 coupon for Rancher's Reserve Steak -- a trademarked brand of Dominick's parent company, Safeway. 
cc licensed flickr photo shared by arnold | inuyaki
Where's the beef, you ask? Why would a celebrity of Jordan's stature be worrying his pretty little head about the one-time misuse of his image and identity to hawk $2 coupons for grocery-store steaks? It's not as if his image is being used to promote something unsavory or embarrassing. Helpfully, Jordan's complaint against Dominick's (available here) explains:
"Jordan has . . . had enormous success as an endorser of products and services" and "[b]y carefully controlling the nature and frequency of his product endorsement . . . Jordan has enhanced and maintained the value of his endorsements." Indeed, the complaint goes on to reveal that "[t]he majority of Jordan's income, and his income potential, is now derived from his ability to license his name and persona to commerical sponsors. . . As a business, the licensing of Jordan's identity is just as important to him now as his professional basketball playing career once was."
So basically, Jordan's image and identity are just too darn valuable to allow even the most minor of infringements. And as it turns out, His Airness has already lent his identify to an eponymous line of steakhouses and mail-order steaks, creating the possibility that consumers could be confused about which steak products he is endorsing. So maybe Jordan's lawsuit isn't so silly after all. Read more about the lawsuit here, here, and here.
Our friendly advice to Dominick's and Jewel? Go out and get a legitimate celebrity endorsement for your products. We can think of one charismatic athlete whose endorsement might be available for quite a bargain.
Sources: Yahoo Sports, Chicago Tribune, Chicago Sun-Times, and The Business Insider.
Monday, December 21, 2009
Fastcase Holiday Reading List











Wednesday, December 16, 2009
Law & Tech Roundup
Our RSS readers are exploding with law and technology news this week. Here are some of the highlights:
Tuesday, December 15, 2009
Important Info for Members of the State Bar of Wisconsin
Thursday, December 10, 2009
Why Aren't NFL Instant Replays Reviewed De Novo?
Duke Law professor Joseph Blocher asks a great question: Why Aren't Instant Replays Reviewed De Novo?
He argues that unlike trial courts, umpires and referees operating in real time are not in the best place to make the correct call. After all, in sports, the reviewing decision-maker is viewing the play multiple times, from many angles, and in slow motion.
Cited in the blog post is a forthcoming Indiana Law Review article by Chad M. Oldfather and Matthew M Fernholz of Marquette University Law School: Comparative Procedure on a Sunday Afternoon: Instant Replay in the NFL as a Process of Appellate Review.
Check out the comments to Blocher's post for extra entertainment. Pretty good.
Source: PrawfsBlawg
Wednesday, December 9, 2009
USPTO Announces "Green" Initiative
The USPTO announced on Monday that it would begin a pilot program to accellerate the examination of patent applications for "green" technologies. According to the USPTO "The new initiative, coming days before the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen, Denmark, will accelerate the development and deployment of green technology, create green jobs, and promote U.S. competitiveness in this vital sector."
If all goes well, the average time it takes to patent a qualifying "green" technology will be reduced by about a year. That may not sound like much, but imagine what one-year head start in the market could mean for consumer technologies like automobiles.
What types of technologies will qualify for expedited treatment? You can find the full list of eligible classfications in the Federal Register. Some notable entries include: human-powered vehicles, hybrid-powered vehicles, wind-powered ships, alternative irrigation techniques, and water conservation systems. Although the list of classifications is suprisingly detailed, with so much at stake, you can be assured that this is a question that will be the soon be the subject of litigation.
Did you know: This move -- providing regulatory incentives to entice the industry to focus research and development -- is not without precedent. Back in 1997, Congress enacted a law that provided marketing incentives -- specifically 6 months of marketing exclusivity -- to drug manufacturers who conduct studies of drugs in children. This law, commonly known as the pediatric exclusivity provision, was part of the Food and Drug Modernization Act. Congress felt that incentives were needed to produce safe and effective pediatric drugs because pharmaceutical firms were reluctant to perform clinical trials on children because the pediatric market is often small relative to the adult market as well as the difficulty of obtaining informed consent for pediatric testing.
Is it working? Well, the answer to that question depends on what you think of the 172 drugs that have been granted exclusivity under this program.
.
Wednesday, December 2, 2009
Business Intelligence and People Finder Now Available on Fastcase!
Fastcase is Hiring
Requirements: Strong organization, writing, and interpersonal skills. The ideal candidate will be an enthusiastic and professional team player with the ability to multi-task and meet project deadlines. Experience in social media, marketing, or legal research is a must. College degree required.
Salary is commensurate with experience. Benefits include complete health care, dental, vision benefit, a relaxed work environment, and paid vacation. Office is in terrific location in Farragut North downtown.
To apply, please send a resume, cover letter, and references to Richa Dasgupta, Director of Customer Outreach, at RDasgupta[at]fastcase[dot]com.







